|
|
|
|
How do we think? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000003 |
Has thinking about thinking got any practical meaning? Thinking about thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000004 |
Posing and solving problems. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000005 |
To which three forms of activity can thinking be divided? Reflecting, dividing, transferring. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000006 |
What are the tasks of the three parts of thinking? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000007 |
Remark. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000009 |
Two classes: instrumensts, categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11000010 |
Normative nucleus of thinking. |
|
|
Mind, intelligence, reasoning |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010001 |
Three types of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010006 |
What is the importance of imagination and reasoning? Imagination and reasoning. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010007 |
What is the essence of reasoned thinking? The essence of reasoned thinking. Mind spoons thoughts from experience. Reasoned thinking elaborates, organizes presently existing. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010008 |
What is the highest property of thinking? Intelligence as the highest property of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010011 |
Probabilistic thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010014 |
Mind is the property of thinking to deduce many of few. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010015 |
Reasoning is the capability of thinking to retrieve little of much. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010018 |
Crystallic net of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010019 |
What are the different properties of reasoning and mind? Memory and comprehension. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010020 |
What are the instruments of mind and reasoning? Intuition and logics. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010021 |
Where are the mechanisms of intuition and logics? Accidental and necessary. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010022 |
What is the role of rules in two kinds of thinking? With and without rules. Logical thinking by rules. Intuitive without rules. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010023 |
What is free thinking? Accidental and necessary. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010024 |
What is the difference in activity of the two kinds of thinking? Orderliness and unorderliness. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010026 |
Which is the prevailing capability? Discursing or probabilistic thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010027 |
What is the orientation of different philosophers in view of the two kinds of thinking? Reasoners and intuitivists. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010028 |
Paradigmas. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010029 |
In what sense is empirism an intermediary capability of thinking? Interpreting from the point of view of existing knowledge. Empirism - probabilistic approach. Rationalists on known, existing knowledge. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010031 |
What is the difference between rationalism and irrationalism? Rationalism and irrationalism. Difference is not only in their relationship to order and disorder. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010032 |
What is the auctority of reason? Auctority of reason. Why not? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010033 |
What kind of contradiction is there in the 'management by reason'? Can part manage the whole? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010034 |
Reason is both part and the whole. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010035 |
How do Descartes and Shakespeare characterize this dicothomy of reason? Rationalism and irrationalism. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010036 |
How can both rationalists and irrationalists be right? Man is both rational and irrational. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010037 |
Empirism as transitional position. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010038 |
How is empirism situated in relationship with rationalism and irrationalism? Empirism as a middle point. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010039 |
What does the transitory character of empirism mean? Empirism can be joined to both. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010040 |
How do empirists relate to the extremes of rationalism and irrationalism? Empirism: repudiating the extremes. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010041 |
What humiliating has said Locke, one of the founders of empirism? All in mind is after perception. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010042 |
What is the significance of the probabilistic character of empirical thinking? Empirism: only probabilistic conclusions. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010044 |
In what sense is the 'razumism' in the most balanced position between the extremities? Razumism. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010047 |
What is the relationship of thinking to feelings? Icy, dead, dry! |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010048 |
Feshness, sharpness, clearness... |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010051 |
What can be said of the negative qualities of thinking? Negative qualities of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010052 |
What are and what are not reflecting properties of thinking? Intelligence is reflecting property of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010053 |
What is the contribution of reflection to intelligence? Preference of intelligence. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010054 |
Intelligence is the conscience of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010055 |
Mind and reasoning are instinctive. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010056 |
What are immediate and indirect thinking? Intelligence is indirect thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010057 |
What about general and particular? Particular - general. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010058 |
How can the use or thinking resources be adjusted according to the need? Mind is heavy artillery of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010060 |
What is characteristic to the thinking in young age? Flexibility of young thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010061 |
What is added to the thinking at the mature age? Definiteness, firmness... |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11010062 |
How does thinking change in old age? Ossified thinking. |
|
|
Qualities of thinking |
|
|
Slyness |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020101 |
Is slyness a good or a bad quality of mind? Slyness means deceit. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020103 |
When is slyness applied? Collision with other mind. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020104 |
What does it mean, when somebody applies slyness continuously? Need of continuous slyness. |
|
|
Wisdom |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020201 |
How can wisdom be defined? Wisdom is synergy. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020202 |
What is needed for wisdom? Experience and thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020203 |
What does a wise man avoid? Extremities avoided. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020204 |
Solving big tasks. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020205 |
What is the difference between knowledge and wisdom? Wisdom is the breathing of a nation. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020206 |
Can wisdom be learned? No wisdom without thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020208 |
Wise man finds worth learning everywhere. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020211 |
Combination of knowledge and good. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020212 |
Knowing how to learn knowing. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11020213 |
Knowing to decide with the knowledge. |
|
|
Reasoning (deductive logics) |
|
|
Reasoning and logics |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030101 |
What is reasoning? Both deductive and probabilistic. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030102 |
What is logics? More order, more logic. Inductive, probabilistic thinking only partially appears logical and therefore genuinely does not deserve to be given the name of being logical. |
|
|
Deduction, reasoning |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030204 |
How can logical thinking be characterized? ...can be shown true or not. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030206 |
Deduction is used in practically all forms of activity. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030207 |
Importance of logic in jurisprudence. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030208 |
Positive and negative forms of logical thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030209 |
Inference. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030210 |
What is the origin of inference? |
|
|
Limits of deductive logics |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11030301 |
What kind of thinking is deduction? Most accurate, most vulnerable... |
|
|
Probabilistic thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040001 |
How common is probabilistic thinking? Probabilistic thinking between deductive and intuitive. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040002 |
What are the forms of probabilistic thinking? Three forms of probabilistic thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040003 |
What is the main 'actor' of probabilistic thinking? Prediction. |
|
|
Prediction |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040101 |
What is the difference between prediction and guess? Convinced or not convinced. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040102 |
What is the difference between prediction and guess? Guess without alternatives. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040103 |
Prediction - a possible outcome. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040104 |
Guess: a categorical outcome. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040105 |
Outcome with or without probability. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040106 |
Guess: either or. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040107 |
What kind of limit between correct and wrong? Fuzzy and unsteady. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11040108 |
What kind of relation to emotions and feelings? Indifferent or passionate. |
|
|
Mind (intuition) |
|
|
Intuition, inspiration, inference, guess |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050101 |
Intuition - capacity of guessing. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050102 |
Inspiration: exitement of mind. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050103 |
Inference. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050104 |
Guess. |
|
|
What is needed for the development of intuition? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050201 |
What is needed for intuition? Experience. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050202 |
Interest in everything. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050203 |
Rich experience. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050204 |
Emotional readiness. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050206 |
Pictorial thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050207 |
'Intuition is mind of imagination.' |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050208 |
Dreaming needed. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050209 |
Role of dreams. |
|
|
Limitedness and absolution of intuition |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050301 |
What is needed in addition to intuition? Logics needed. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050302 |
Can intuition give ready knowledge or ready idea? Logical test needed. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11050304 |
Only one step to mystic inference. |
|
|
Intelligence (dialectic thinking) |
|
|
Idea is mind of intelligence |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060101 |
Idea is the richest, most comprehensive... |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060103 |
What is the significance of the idea for thinking? Idea is the combustible of thinking. |
|
|
Dialectics of ideas |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060201 |
Does idea contain contradictions? Manifold of contradictions. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060202 |
How do ideas arise? Idea between task and solution. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060203 |
How does idea relate to solution of a task? Temporary solution. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060204 |
What kind of contradiction is idea? Transition from task to solution. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060205 |
How is expressed the subjectivity of idea? Mobilizing passionate interest. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060206 |
How does idea combine passivity and activity? Idea as the beginning of activity. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060207 |
What is the relation of idea to intuitive and logical thinking? Product of mutual work of intuitive and logical thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060208 |
Can the idea be drawn from the basic knowledge about the problem? Logics cannot lead to ideas. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060209 |
Can the idea be only continuation of intuition? Intuitive thought is accepted or not. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060210 |
How does the idea relate to intuitive and logical thought? Intuitive beginning, logical definition. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060212 |
Are intuition and logics mutually exclusive? Unity of opposite means of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060213 |
How does intuitive thinking differ from logical? Absence of internal connections. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060214 |
Is all logical thinking conscious? Speed by excluding internal connections. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060215 |
What is the role of intuition in the learning of skills? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060216 |
Can computer work on incomplete information? Incomplete information. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060217 |
Why cannot life be reproduced by computers? Static totality of elements. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060218 |
What is the origin of intuitive thinking? Inference can be reproduced. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060219 |
Is life needed for intuitive thought? Logical thought is indifferent to feelings, emotions. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060220 |
What is needed for creative process? Logics represents human race in thinking. |
|
|
How does idea develop thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060302 |
How does idea differ from any thought? Idea develops a thought further. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060303 |
What is the relationship between task and solution? Combinng task and solution. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060304 |
What is the relationship between subject and object in practical activity? Subject subordiantes object. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060305 |
What is the role of ideas in connetion between subject and object? Ideas as intermediary connections. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060306 |
What is the significance of intuition for thinking? Idea makes the process. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060307 |
Is it true: the more thoughts, the better? It is not true: the more thoughts, the better. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060308 |
In what sense is idea a watershed? Appearance of an idea is a revolution. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060310 |
Spiral form of thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060312 |
How does a thought become an idea in a spiral-like development? Coil of a spiral. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060313 |
What happens in the second coil of a spiral? Across the border to action. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060314 |
What does the second cycle mean to the idea? Idea becomes accepted to lead into thinking system. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060315 |
How does the second stage differ from the first? An antithesis occurs. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060316 |
Where does the last stage lead? Back to the starting point. |
|
|
Location of idea in the creative process |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060402 |
What is needed to a controlled organized process? Idea is needed for a controlled process. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060403 |
Of what consists the meaning of the idea for creative process? Idea as a charge needed for creative process. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060404 |
Three etappes |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060405 |
What is the main content of the first etappe? Old means of solution no more good. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060406 |
What consists the second etappe? Transition to oriented process. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060407 |
Does the etappe of creative work come out suddenly? Distance between the birth and creative stage. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060408 |
How is the idea inspected, verified? Following certain rules. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060409 |
Are there some criteria for the acceptance of the idea? Criteria for the evaluation of idea. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060410 |
What are the criteria for the definition of ideas? Truth and usefulness. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060411 |
What is the criterium of possible truth? Experience and practice. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060412 |
Are there different degrees of truthfulness? Depending on amount of knowledge. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060413 |
Is there any subjective element in the evaluation? Different levels of knowledge. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060414 |
Do the criteria have an objective foundation? Level of education. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060415 |
What is the criterium for the definition of practical idea? Possible usefulness. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060416 |
Which properties must the idea fulfil for possible usefulness? Interest, need... |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060417 |
What kind of consciousness is needed? Clear-cut consciousness. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060418 |
From the point of view of implementation what is important? Not too large expenditures. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060419 |
Why is possible usefulness important? Ideas of essential interest of people are found. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060420 |
What can be said of the role of criteria of possible truthfulness? Necessary for practical ideas. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060421 |
Are artistic ideas somehow special? Dependence of artistic taste. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060422 |
Has methodology any significance? Methodologically solid ideas. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060423 |
What happens during the third etappe of on the way from birth to solution? Solution of the problem. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060424 |
What are the basic functions of ideas? Basic functions. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060425 |
What is essential in the synthetic function of the idea? Joining into the system. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060426 |
What happens at the 'door' to the world of unexplored? Innumerable richdom of new things. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060427 |
What double task solves the synthetic function of idea? Conservation of it as an integral education. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060428 |
What does the regulating function mean? Disciplining the thinking of man. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060429 |
What is an example of the power of regulating function? Case of pathologic disturbance of thinking process. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060430 |
What is the significance of regulative function for the transition to solution? Leads the idea through difficulties. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060431 |
What is the essence of the heuristic function A jerk to the world of unrecognized. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060432 |
What possibilities has the heuricstic function? New knowledge, new object, new performance. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060433 |
Is courage needed for new ideas? Reckless ideas. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11060434 |
What is the significance of the new? New is a goal in itself. |
|
|
Categorial structure of thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070002 |
What are categories? Ideal tools of human activity. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070003 |
Do philosophers discuss categories different from common people? Philosophers approachin the common use. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070004 |
Are not people thinking systematically also without categories? Systematically with questions. |
|
|
Categorical logics of thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070101 |
Are categories possible independently of our will? ‘We cannot think any single object without the help of categories.' |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070102 |
What kind is the structure of categories? Pyramide of hierarchical system. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070104 |
Is a structural orientation along the categories possible? Classification of the structure. From unforeseen richness of perceivable world is taken the most essential and thanks to classification conserved in memory. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070105 |
‘rationally logical rules’ |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070106 |
Emergence of categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070107 |
Definition along general categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070108 |
What is the essence of the categorial structure of thinking? System of categories of thinking, categorical structure. Our thinking reflects categorical structure of the world in the way of spontaneously settling system of categories of thinking, categorical structure. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070109 |
What are the very primitive categorical definitions? Natural systems of categories of thinking and categorical definition of the world. Primary categorical definitions are the definitions of the world itself, its selfdefinitions, that is, the natural system of categorical definitions, which (as also the world as a whole) exists independently of man and mankind. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070110 |
Can the categorical structure be called 'picture of the world'? Categorical picture of the world. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070113 |
Why is needed a conscious discovery of categories? Why is needed consciousness of categories? Spontaneous use of categories means undesired absolution of some categories in detriment of others. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070114 |
Has the categorical logics always been recognized? System of forms of existence. Sufficiently full system is needed. |
|
|
How are categories working and emerging? |
|
|
Expression of categories in language. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070301 |
How are categories expressed in the structure of language? Grammatical parts of speaking. |
|
|
Table of categories |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070401 |
Pronouns and pronominal adverbs. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070402 |
How does the categorial thinking develop? ‘why-age’ in the book ‘From two to five’. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070403 |
On what basis is the categorical structure constructed? Inquisitive words. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070404 |
Crucial questions. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070405 |
Scholastic logics. Nine questions as instruments in revelation of truth. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070406 |
What are the 'seven questions' in retorics? Seven questions in retorics. To reveal person, activity, location, partners, goal, means and time. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070409 |
Are philosophic categories the 'real thing'? Primary material for categories is in natural thinking and language. Philosophic categories asre only descriptions of natural everyday thinking. |
|
|
“Kitchen” of categorical logics |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070502 |
Why are categories arranged pairwise? Are there other possibilities? Pairwise organization. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070503 |
Categorical blocs and subsystems. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070504 |
Can category consist of categories? System of concepts. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070505 |
What are the subcategories expressing? Subcategories and mother categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070506 |
Is there any connection between categories in horizontal direction? Intercategorical relations. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070507 |
How can these intercategorical relationships be described? ‘Chemical compounds’ of various categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070508 |
Is there some concrete examples of this kind of compound categories? Quantitative and spatial concepts. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070509 |
Are categories something 'once and forever' or is there some fluctuation? They ‘drift’ all over. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070510 |
What is the idea of intercategorical concepts? Connections remove the problem of flexibility and rigidity. The flexibility of category is conditioned by its reflections (reverberation) in other categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070511 |
Does the fact that some words have several meanings cause some difficulties? Unequivocally used words. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070512 |
Isn't a large part of words in some sense uniequivocal? Polysemantic words. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070513 |
In what way may words have unclear meaning? Three non-categorical meanings. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070514 |
What determines the equivocality of words, designating categories? What determines the equivocality of words? Answer from the history of the language. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070515 |
But are there categories of thinking without words? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070516 |
Visually schematic presentation. Table of main and subcategories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070521 |
Coexistence of substance and living organism |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070523 |
Liquid, hard body, gas. |
|
|
Categories are color and brush for the philosopher |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070602 |
Why is justified the expression ’categorical picture of the world’? Justification of ’categorical picture of the world’. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070603 |
Language of categories. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070604 |
In what way can be compared the task of philosopher with that of artist? Philosopher as artist. |
|
|
Methodological function of categorical logics |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070701 |
What is the main task of the categorical structure of thinking? Categorical structure combines intuition and reasoning logics. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070702 |
Need of firmness of supporting points. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070703 |
Can categorical reference points be compared with a net of coordinates? System of categories may remind of the net of coordinates. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070704 |
What is the methodologic function of categorical logics? Reference points of cognitive and practical activity. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070706 |
Categories and methods |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11070407 |
Connection of different categories. |
|
|
Common sense, sound thinking |
|
|
Sound idea is a great value in thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080101 |
What is 'normal'? Normal defined. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080102 |
What is the difference between sound thinking and thinking in general? Sound thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080103 |
What is essential in human behavior? Behavior according to sound thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080104 |
What is the role of common sense in normal and sound thinking? Common sense. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080105 |
How is defined sound thinking? Moderate behavior. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080107 |
Is sound thinking in a way golden middle way? Not white neither black. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080108 |
Is sound thinking something like logical thinking? Avoiding paradoxes. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080109 |
Is logics used all over in sound thinking? Moderate use of logics, too. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080111 |
Where is the difference between sound thinking and common sense? Not in contents. The difference between sound thinking and common sense is not in the contents but their bearance to different objects. |
|
|
To the history of question |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080202 |
Is common sense a kind of general feeling? General feeling coordines the perception. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080203 |
Do common sense and general feeling have a long history? Comprehension. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080204 |
‘Discretion’ and ‘reasonableness’. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080207 |
Common sense and phantasy. Common sense is opposed to unrestrained phantasy. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080210 |
Cannot common sense and reason be used as synonyms? Basis of human thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080211 |
Keep the golden midway. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080217 |
Has common sense something to do with feelings? |
|
|
Against the valuation of common sense as of working only 'within the walls of homestead' |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080301 |
Is common sense also accepted on more sophisticated levels of intellect? Metaphysical model of thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080302 |
Amundsen's dog relay. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080304 |
Can sound idea be understood as something superficial? Profound is not complicated. |
|
|
Limitations of sound idea |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080401 |
Can common sense be considerd as the fundament for making reasonable decisions? Full-valued, active thinking. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080402 |
Is common sense always sufficient? Common sense is only a condition of fullvalued life. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080403 |
Is common sense something absolute? Common sense is practical. |
|
|
Versatility and manifoldness of sound thinking |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080501 |
Is there variation in the quantity and quality of common sense? Different quality and different quantity of common sense. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080503 |
Lack of common sense. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080504 |
But isn't healthy scepticism a sound property? Healthy scepticism. |
|
|
Sound thinking can be developed and corrected |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080601 |
Can common sense be developed? Obtained with conscious efforts. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080602 |
Does common sense develop by aging? Developing by aging. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080603 |
Does commons sense vary along with professional orientation? Different by profession. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080604 |
Does common sense depend on the degree of erudition? Erudition increases common sense. |
|
|
Unsound thinking, unsound idea |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080701 |
Is there variation in the pathologic thinking? Pathologic thinking. |
|
|
How we think, so we live |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 11080804 |
Happiness depends on conditional internal order. |
|
|
|
|