|
|
| ||
|
Human among other humans |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06000001 |
What is 'through the prism of the study of golden rule of behavior'? Golden rule of behavior. ‘Do not do others what you do not wish that they did to you’ and ‘behave towards others as you wish that they behave towards you’. |
|||
|
Human in a society |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010001 |
Why is philosopher the most appropriate to speak of man in general? Philosopher's position. Only philosopher has on him the all-embracing view on man. For him man is both subject and object, and one, and non-one, both ‘I’ and ‘we’, both individual and human race. Such view on man is conditioned by the special character of philosopher being universal thinker. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010002 |
What is universalism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010003 |
Dividing and collecting meanings of words? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010004 |
Give me examples of dividing and collecting senses! |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010005 |
Which is primary: man or society? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010006 |
What is it in reality: man or society? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06010007 |
What is an eternal contradiction of life of man? |
|||
|
Golden rule of behavior |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020001 |
What is the basis of mutual relationships with other people and society? |
|||
|
Ancestors on golden rule |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020102 |
Which is the oldest written document about the golden rule? Golden rule. Babylon. “Son, what seems to you bad, you must neither do to your comrade” |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020103 |
Who is considered to be the creator of the golden rule? Seven Greek wise men. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020104 |
What says Confucius on the golden rule? China. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020105 |
How about Buddha? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020106 |
And the Indian wise men? ’Mahabharate’ |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020110 |
Do also the Greek and the Roman thinkers state the golden rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020114 |
And certainly also in Bible? Bible. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020115 |
Evangelium. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020119 |
Partial statements of golden rule. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020121 |
Basic principle of natural law and morality. |
|||
|
T. Hobbes and J. Locke about golden rule |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020201 |
Who are the main exponents of the golden rule in the New times? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020203 |
Which are the two known moments of Hobbes' concepts? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020206 |
What are the main ideas of Locke about the golden rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020207 |
What does Locke consider as the precondition of the golden rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020209 |
Certainly also the Age of Enlightenment has considered the golden rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020210 |
Also Voltaire...? |
|||
|
Golden rule and Immanuel Kant’s categoric imperative |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020301 |
What is the denomination used by Kant of the golden rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020302 |
Is it true that Kant deprived some of the strength of the golden rule in his writings? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020303 |
Aren't there other formulations, where Kant does more justice to the rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020306 |
Why did Kant not take the golden rule so seriously? |
|||
|
Golden rule as ’justification of good’ by V.S. Solovyov |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020401 |
In what sense did Solovyov refer to the golden rule? Justification of good. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020410 |
Which two parts can be distinguished in the priciple of altruism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020411 |
Why is important the indivisibility of the two rules? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020412 |
What was the idea of the polemics between Solovyov and Schopehauer? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020413 |
What did Solovyov show? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020414 |
[AJK]: Darwin's principle of the 'survival of the fittest'? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020415 |
How does the rule work unconsciously? |
|||
|
The golden rule is the main principle of human intercourse |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020505 |
In what sense does the golden rule give a holistic notion of moralism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020506 |
In what sense can the golden rule be considered as a measuring system? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020507 |
Why can the golden rule be considered as the minimum requirement of moral? Minimum moral requirement. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020508 |
Why can the golden rule be considered as the maximum requirement of moral? Maximum moral requirement. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020510 |
What is the relationship of the golden rule to the category of duty? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020511 |
What is duty? Definition of duty. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020512 |
What are diseases of the society? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020513 |
How is the life and health of society a continuation of a concrete man? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020514 |
What is justice? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020515 |
How can the golden rule be considered as the formula of freedom? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020516 |
In what way the golden rule simplifies the relationship of man and society? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020517 |
Why is the ”eye for eye, tooth for tooth” rule destructive of its nature? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020519 |
Why don't people always follow the golden rule? A self-destroying society. |
|||
|
The golden rule is far from being as elementary as it seems to be |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020602 |
Normal, healthy person. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020603 |
Placing to the position of others. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06020604 |
Killing prohibited. |
|||
|
Good and evil
|
|||
|
Discriminating moral concepts of good and evil From general concepts of good and evil |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030102 |
Cannot a natural phenomenon be both good and bad? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030103 |
How can we define 'absolute good' and 'absolute evil'? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030104 |
What is the limit of moral good and evil? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030106 |
In what case can the relationship of man to nature be considered a moral one? |
|||
|
What is such good? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030201 |
What is the definition of good? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030208 |
How does the definition of good arise from the golden rule? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030214 |
What is 'saving help'? |
|||
|
Good and bad in the mutual correspondency of reality and possibility |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030301 |
Why is it dangerous to study problems in the aspects of reality only? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030312 |
“What would do your good, if there were no evil?..” Master and Margareth. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030313 |
Is evil needed to enjoy good music? Moral evil only disturbs. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030315 |
What is the solution of the problem of the coexistence of good and evil? Evil not normal condition. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030316 |
What is the danger of absolutizing the ctegory of actuality? |
|||
|
Human being is good by his nature. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030402 |
Is human being good or evil by his nature? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030405 |
What does |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030406 |
According to Kant: Is man good or evil? Man is evil by nature. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030407 |
Can there be a compromise between man being good or evil? Neither good nor evil. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030408 |
What is Balashov's view in this question? Evil man is an anomaly. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030409 |
What is the basis of the assumption of innocence until otherwise shown? Assumption of innocency. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030410 |
What is ment by the concept of 'sincerity' here? Innocent until shown guilty. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030411 |
Why is Henry Ford considered a benefactor of humanity? One of the greatest good deeds. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030412 |
What is the good feature of capitalists? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030413 |
Why do parents take care of their children? Parents - good people by definition. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030414 |
Are parents to be considered robots or animals? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030415 |
Are self-sacrifice and heroism the main motives of goodness? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030418 |
Cannot suffering people be healthy by their nature? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030419 |
How did the moral behaviour begin? Morality has biological roots. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030421 |
What follows, if it is assumed that man is by nature evil? if evil... |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030424 |
... as ostrich, who hides its head into sand? as ostrich, who hides his head... |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030425 |
What determines the quality of life in evil surroundings? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030426 |
What kind of life, if neither good, nor evil? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030427 |
How do relate to people, if at least half of them may be expected evil? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030428 |
What is meant by 'slippery' behaviour? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030429 |
What can be expected, if we assume that man is good of the nature? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030430 |
What kind of atmosphere follows, if people are expected to be good by nature? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030431 |
What do you think of yourself, if you are convinced that man is good by the nature? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030432 |
Why does Balashov not agree with Tolstoy? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030433 |
What is meant by saying: ‘better is the enemy of good’? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030434 |
Is it necessary to have evil in order to get some good instead? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030435 |
Is it necessary for a creative person to commit also evil deeds? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030436 |
Is it necessary to shade good with evil? |
|||
|
How to fight evil and is it necessary to fight it? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030501 |
Nonconfrontation of evil by violence. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030502 |
Is it normal to fight evil? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030503 |
What is meant by the Tolstoyan ‘nonconfrontation of evil by violence’? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030504 |
If evil exists, what should be done with it? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030506 |
To whom does an evildoer cause the most evil? History of humanity. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030509 |
What should happen, if people constantly were enemies to each other? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030510 |
Of what is testifying the growth of the length of life? Length of life. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030511 |
What means the continuous progress of material and spiritual culture? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030512 |
What means evil? Evil means destruction. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030515 |
May geniuses be bad? Genius does not destruct, but creates. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06030516 |
If genius and illdoing unite, what is the duality then? |
|||
|
Humanism is the philosophy of mankind |
|||
|
What is humanism? |
|||
|
What is the highest value of humanism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040226 |
How can I be an image of the whole humankind? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040316 |
What value has the story of the creation of world and man by god? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040319 |
Catholic and Orthodox churches. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040320 |
Chirurgical operation. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040324 |
Most genuine obscurantism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040325 |
Clones of human beings live among us. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040326 |
Speculation with ignorance. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040329 |
Put aside philosophy and science. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040330 |
For some wisecracks… |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040333 |
("polygnosis”) |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040334 |
‘The Future Shock’ |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040411 |
Respect of people. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040431 |
Traffic rules. |
|||
|
Can humanism offer happiness? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040502 |
What are the qualities of a noble person? |
|||
|
What is the golden rule of humanistic moral? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040601 |
Nobility as a property of humanism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040602 |
What is justice from the standpoint of humanism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040626 |
Abolition of capital punishment. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040627 |
Death sentence is killing out of judicial sentence. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040627 |
Dignity of man. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040631 |
Punishing not the criminal, but his closest and friends. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06040661 |
Where is the mindfulness of human life? |
|||
|
Why does not humanist call himself humanist? |
|||
|
About love to oneself and others. |
|||
|
Possible correction of moral conceptions |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050101 |
What is the common fault of egoism and altruism? Moral assessment of egoism and altruism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050102 |
Are all people egoists? Egoism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050105 |
What is the art of being oneself? ‘The art of being oneself’. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050106 |
What is the recipe of peace for all world? The recipe of peace to all world. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050108 |
What is egoism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050110 |
What did Aristotle say about the true egoism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050111 |
What is Aristotle's advice to egoism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050113 |
What is moral prohibition of greater love to oneself? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050115 |
What is 'reasonable egoism'? Reasonable egoism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050116 |
What is the idea of 'I' and 'we'? The idea of ’I’ and ‘we’. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050117 |
Can altruism be harmful? Altruism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050118 |
How tight is the connection between egoism and altruism? Altruism and egoism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050119 |
Can altruism have catastrophal consequences? Catastrophal consequences. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050120 |
Can self-sacrificing lead to sacrificing of others, too? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050121 |
Does altruism include also self-sacrificing? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050123 |
Why has self-sacrifice become an accepted attitude? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050124 |
What has Dostoyevsky written on self-sacrifice? Dostoyevsky: 'The highest self-rule of freedom of own will.' |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050126 |
Is Dostoyevsky a collectivist? Personality is only personality. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050127 |
How about Solovyov? Reproach to V.S. Solovyov. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050128 |
What is heroism? Heroism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050129 |
What is normal behaviour? Normal behavior. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050130 |
Do we have many social contacts? Unilateral social contact dies out. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050131 |
What does creativity mean? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06050132 |
Is normal enough? |
|||
|
Collectivism and /or individualism
|
|||
|
Collectivism pro and contra |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060101 |
What said | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060102 |
Is human moral collectivistic? |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060103 |
What is hypercollectivism? Simple collectivism and hypercollectivism. |
|||
|
Positive power of collectivism |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060201 |
What can be said pro collectivism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060202 |
Why did Newton see so far? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060203 |
Is hockey an individualistic play? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060204 |
Would exit into outer space have been possible without collective input? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060205 |
Does collectivism imply heroism? |
|||
|
Minuses of the collective principle of ‘one for all and all for one’ |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060301 |
Is collectivism always, in all cases good? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060302 |
Does 'one for all, all for one' always serve moral purposes? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060306 |
Do we need unity to any purpose at any price? |
|||
|
Destructive or deformed collectivism (hypercollectivism) |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060402 |
Forms of destructive or deformed collectivism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060403 |
What is the purpose of terrorism? |
|||
|
Positive meaning of individualism |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060504 |
What is the advantage of polydirecional action of individualists? Individuals as graphit corebars. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060506 |
Can an individual be right and all other wrong? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060507 |
Can part of human moral be outside the competence of collectivism? |
|||
|
Suffocating by embracing |
|||
|
Distortions of collectivism and individualism |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Distortions |
|||
|
Mutual enabling of collectivism and individualism |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060802 |
Can individualism exist in the conditions of hypercollecivism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060803 |
Most genuine individualists. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060804 |
Is science an example of a collective conscience? |
|||
|
Friendship is a compromise |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060902 |
Can extreme individualism and friendship be combined? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060903 |
How about extreme collectivism and friendship? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060904 |
Friendship as nonsexual love. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06060905 |
(G. Serebrjakova ’Predecessors’) |
|||
|
Comradeship |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061001 |
Comradeship is collectivism with 'elbow-feeling'. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061003 |
Friendship and brotherhood. |
|||
|
Brotherhood |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061101 |
... almost comradeship. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061103 |
’all people are brothers’ is utopistic. |
|||
|
Humanity |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061201 |
All-comprehensive character. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061202 |
Is humanity only a collectivist concept? |
|||
|
Patriotism, nationalism, chauvinism |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061307 |
Genuine poetical chauvinism. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061314 |
’Russian idea’. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061316 |
What is the contents of the 'Russian idea'? The 'Russian idea'. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061317 |
Effort to monopolizise the concept of national selfconsciousness. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061318 |
What is a nation? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06061319 |
Most genuine Russian Nazism. |
|||
|
Duty |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06070002 |
What is duty? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06070004 |
Partial aspects of duty. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06070005 |
Place and time coordinates of duty. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06070006 |
What are the limits of duty? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06070009 |
Was duty a too big word for Kant? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06070011 |
Duty is a moral necessity. |
|||
|
Conscience |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080002 |
What are the consequences of acting against conscience? Conscience is a fundamental moral category. |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080003 |
What is the regulative role of conscience? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080004 |
What is clear conscience according to Feuerbach? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080005 |
Does everybody have a conscience? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080006 |
How heavy can the pains of conscience be? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080007 |
What is conscience according to Nietzsche? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080008 |
What is Nietzsche's attitude towards moral? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080009 |
What was the relationship between Hitler and Nietzsche? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080010 |
What was the price of the amoralism of Hitler? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080011 |
Is the Nietzschean attitude towards conscience still live? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080012 |
Can there be still worse than Hitlerism? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06080013 |
What is conscientiousness? |
|||
|
Nobility |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06090001 |
What is nobility? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06090002 |
What are the qualities of a noble person? |
|||
|
Unhappy and criminal conscience |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06100001 |
What kind of world faces a person with unhappy and criminal coscience? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06100003 |
How is a person with criminal consciousness reasoning? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06100012 |
What kind of consciousness is a criminal consciousness? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06100014 |
How are the persons with criminal conscience reasoning? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06100017 |
How are terrorists thinking? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06100018 |
How are terrorists justifying their acts? |
|||
|
About the culture of behavior |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06110002 |
What is internal culture? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06110003 |
What is external culture? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06110005 |
Why is external culture independent of internal? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06110006 |
What else can be external culture? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06110007 |
Which two parts are distinguished in external culture? |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 06110010 |
Can you compensate the lack of knowledge of the rules of behaviour? |
|||
|
Normal mutual relationships of people are a refined material |
|||
|
About good and noble education |
|||
|
About politeness |
|||
|
Magic words |
|||
|
Ethics of telephone discussion |
|||
|
Complaisance, punctuality |
|||
|
|
|